How federal child-support funding turned “impartial” judges into enforcement partners. What Is Title IV-D? Title IV-D of the Social Security Act (42 U.S.C. § 651 et seq.) created a national reimbursement system that pays states to locate parents, establish paternity, and enforce child-support orders. Each state must maintain a single Title IV-D agency—usually in its […]

Introduction to Jurisdiction In every court proceeding—civil, criminal, or administrative—jurisdiction stands as the foundation of lawful power. Without jurisdiction, every order, judgment, or act is void ab initio. No where is this principle more essential than in child support enforcement cases, where the state exercises coercive power over liberty, property, and parental rights. When service […]

For nearly two decades, I have been fighting a system that destroys families, strips fathers of their rights, and hides behind fraudulent paperwork to keep federal dollars flowing. My case is not just personal—it is a window into how Title IV-D funding has corrupted the courts and turned due process into a revenue stream. The […]

Introduction to SEC v. Jarkesy Supreme Court Decision The SEC v. Jarkesy case represents a significant legal battle with substantial repercussions across multiple domains, including securities regulation and child support enforcement. The case centers on George Jarkesy, who faced allegations of securities fraud for misleading investors and misappropriating funds. This issue drew the attention of […]