The Adjudicated Fact Crandall v. Nevada, 73 US 35 – Supreme Court 1868 Requires Free Access to Judicial Tribunals by a Natural Individual with a Constitutional Right to Petition the Court

In the landmark case of Crandall v. Nevada, the Supreme Court of the United States established an important principle regarding the right of free access to judicial tribunals for natural individuals with a constitutional right to petition the court. Decided in 1868, this case held significant implications for the protection of individual rights and the functioning of the legal system.

The case of Crandall v. Nevada originated from the imposition of a tax on individuals leaving the state of Nevada. The state legislature had passed a law requiring a payment of one dollar by any person leaving the state by railroad or stagecoach. The purpose of this tax was to raise revenue for the state. However, the law was challenged by a natural individual named Myra Bradwell Crandall, who argued that it violated her constitutional rights.

Crandall’s argument centered around the right to travel and the right to petition the court, both of which she believed were being infringed upon by the state of Nevada. She contended that the tax imposed an undue burden on her ability to exercise her constitutional rights and violated the principles of free access to judicial tribunals.

The Supreme Court, in its ruling, agreed with Crandall’s arguments and held that the tax imposed by Nevada was unconstitutional. The Court emphasized the importance of the right to travel as a fundamental right inherent in the concept of personal liberty. It also recognized the right of individuals to petition the court as a vital aspect of the democratic process.

The Court’s decision in Crandall v. Nevada established the principle that natural individuals have a constitutional right to free access to judicial tribunals. This means that individuals should not be subjected to unreasonable restrictions or burdens that impede their ability to seek justice through the courts. The ruling affirmed the fundamental importance of the right to petition the court and the need for unfettered access to the legal system.

Furthermore, the case highlighted the significance of the right to travel as an essential aspect of personal liberty. The Court recognized that the ability to move freely within and between states is crucial for the exercise of other fundamental rights and for the overall well-being of individuals.

The impact of the Crandall v. Nevada decision extends beyond the specific issue of the tax imposed by the state. It stands as a precedent for the protection of individual rights and the preservation of the democratic process. The ruling ensures that natural individuals have the freedom to seek redress in the courts without unnecessary obstacles or hindrances.

Moreover, the case reinforces the principle that the right to petition the court is not limited to certain individuals or groups but applies to all natural individuals. It underscores the inclusive nature of the constitutional right to access judicial tribunals and emphasizes the equal protection of the law for all.

In conclusion, the adjudicated fact of Crandall v. Nevada, 73 US 35 – Supreme Court 1868, established the requirement for free access to judicial tribunals by natural individuals with a constitutional right to petition the court. This landmark decision affirmed the importance of the right to travel and the right to seek justice through the courts. It serves as a reminder of the fundamental principles that underpin the legal system and the protection of individual rights.